An Inconvenient truth argument

Researchers have been arguing about the documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” which represents the global warming issue. Some critics’ admired this movie. This essay will outline the two sides of the argument about An Inconvenient truth film.
Number of people agreed about this movie. First of all, the main point was that Al Gore’s presenting constructs the film in a very interesting way which showed that he had a huge background on this issue. For example, he dealt with the audience as adults; moreover he added some entertainments like jokes. Furthermore he stayed away from political principles in his documentary. In the empire reviews stated that Statistic and scientists proved that the global warming is not new observable fact (O’Hara 2). They support their opinion by several excellent environmental researchers who says that Al Gore have the correct facts.
However, there are some discussions against. The first point to consider is that the reviewers believe that he is trying to be against the Republicans, where they admitted that this documentary was making fun of Bush administration and other Republicans. Another point is that Al Gore waist a very long period only for proving that the global warming is taking place. According to Scott, the film doesn’t provide the impression to be about the global warming but it is about Al Gore’s life (Scott 1)
In conclusion, the movie converse a crucial issue “global warming” even with the arguments for and against it. I recommend that we all should work as a one hand in order to protect the planet from the calamite changes.

Works Cited
O'Hara, Helen. "An Inconvenient Truth." Http://www.empireonline.com. 26 Feb. 2009 .
Scott, and Eric. "Movie Review Inconvenient Truth, An." Three Movie Buffs Review. 25 Nov. 2006. Paramount Classice. 26 Feb. 2009 .